May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a fantastic alternative to a traditional ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into your mouth, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you may go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco Juul Compatible Pods alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco in to the marketplace.
Plus the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which implies that fewer people will purchase them.